“They’re like blogs, only papery-er”
READ BEFORE READING:
{My recent interview with Ken Druse jostled my thoughts again relative to the topic of “the future” as it relates to communication and this passion of ours called gardening. I don’t pretend for a minute to have all or any of the answers, and you know what they say about free “advice”. I promise the next post will be something plant-related. We need some relief from the doldrums, right?}
I just heard Craig Ferguson on his CBS late night TV show say this in reference to newspapers. He’s implying of course that blogs basically substitute for newspapers. But do they? Now I’m not a likely defender of a business as lamely stifling as newspapers, but Craig’s caper of sorts deserves exploration.
As bloggers, we must really have the world duped. Do blogs really suffice for the kind of journalism relied on and expected for generations in a format like newspapers? Not hardly. But is the point of a blog to really transmit news? Some blogs do of course, particularly those kept by prominent columnists or newspaper writers. They become subsidiaries of the larger publishing machine, transmitting early leads or insights that later formulate into full-blown stories. But most blogs really are idea platforms, and only that, existing as the result of passive, fragmented consumption. They give some writers 15-minutes of fame, offer popular authors a chance to keep in touch with audience members in a more personal way, and still offer more a chance to push agendas to the masses–even the 10 or so who choose to listen. And while bloggers enjoy support en masse (that whole community idea), their demise comes from an overcrowded room. Right now, particularly in the gardening realm, little oxygen remains in that room. When a form of content delivery continues to fragment the market, it’s time for reconciliation. A new mall only needs so many shoe stores before someone has to give.
So what next? How does an oversaturated market correct itself? In the world of real, tangible products and stuff, things start to disappear. In the iris world for example, almost 50,000 cultivars have entered the marketplace in the last 100 years. How many are left in existence? Probably 10-15% or less. How many are left and really popular, frequently sold, or grown in more than five gardens? Probably 3-5%. So let’s replace irises with gardening blogs in that analogy. Nobody is mandating that bad, inactive, infrequently updated, or poorly written blogs disappear for the sake of others. Anyone is entitled to share their opinions. But who listens?
That’s where this whole mess runs astray. Who listens and reads? Who cares? And more importantly, why do those people listen, read, and care? Does a blog entertain? Does it stimulate thought? Does it deliver content that more than five readers want to read? While blogs and other online media have unlocked the gates of publishing to all, they’ve also systematically unraveled standards of excellence. No venture (whether market, business, hobby, etc.) has ever operated successfully in the absence of governing standards of excellence–they’re natural products of human-mediated enterprises that result when poor-quality products are perceived the same way as good-quality products. My prediction, crystal ball firmly in tow, is that blogs will eventually become major powerhouses of content because the few that will remain post-excellence apocalypse will maintain tribal followings of people who demand and expect content produced and delivered in superior ways. How do you think newspapers like the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post still exist, even in this turmoil that publishing is in?
So how do those blogs exist pre-excellence apocalypse? They impose those standards of excellence on themselves, rise above current expectations, bond with their followers, and teach them to dream. When people enter the business of teaching people to dream, the market drives itself. Look at the success of Apple, for example. One company has effectively inspired its clients (and those that aren’t yet) to dream of the possibilities. If newspapers, blogs, and books inspired their readers to dream of the possibilities of their product (not just how it’s delivered), we wouldn’t even be having this discussion.
Really, all this is just a mantra for how to do business in this day and age…..any business.

|
| Published on January 19th, 2010 | Posted by Kelly Norris |



January 19th, 2010 at 7:14 am
The vast majority of blogs that discuss newsworthy events do so after linking to and quoting from newspapers or other MSM sources. Blogs and the MSM are (or at least should be) partners, not supplements for each other.
That being said, the “governing standards of excellence” are seriously tarnished in the MSM, if they exist at all. Just off the top of my head I can think of at least a dozen major MSM scandals in the last few years. They only have the appearance of standards. Not ones that are consistently, uniformly, and widely enforced.
January 19th, 2010 at 3:34 pm
You’re indeed right, which really is a whole ‘nutha subject I didn’t want to verge into. MSM is no ivory tower! But the point I was trying to make was that contextually relevant standards of excellence have to come into play in our (garden) writing world, particularly those that relate to a new audience. What does that audience want? What do they want but not know they want? We’ve got to push the envelope on ourselves.
January 19th, 2010 at 5:55 pm
Lots of food for thought here.
Glad to have found you on Blotanical,
although you’ve obviously been around for a long time!
Alice
aka Bay Area Tendrils Garden Travel
January 19th, 2010 at 6:40 pm
Hey Alice! Thanks for chiming in. I’m good for food for thought, even if you don’t always agree. I like to think and stimulate cognitive action in others!
(though usually more often about plants….the winter doldrums have my head in “media” of lately)
January 22nd, 2010 at 2:38 pm
As far as I know, there is no fact checking in illustrated garden book publishing. The NY Times makes mistakes — more these days, now that they have cut so much staff — but it is still the best reporting/writing around. Where should we turn for acurate information? Fox? Sarah Palin? These days, truth comes from the MSM outlet that agrees with you. I cringe when I hear some people under 20 say they get their “news” from Fox. Perhaps some of us should get together and rate gardening blogs. Is that being done?
January 26th, 2010 at 7:28 am
Just listened to the podcast. Great interview, both of you!
February 9th, 2010 at 9:43 pm
I think there are places that rate garden blogs… I think a great garden blog shows what you love, what you know, and what you don’t know and need help with… fun pictures are an added bonus.
February 10th, 2010 at 5:29 am
I think you’re exactly right. Good blogs have a refreshing honesty about them!
February 16th, 2010 at 3:18 pm
Blogs open the world to a multitude of writers and their thoughts. not all of them are accurate and I suspect more than a few just like to hear the sound of their own “voice” Which will survive? Perhaps I am a bit jaded in my old age, but it seems that like today’s headlines, the most outrageous blogs get the most attention. Read to many of them and your mind will go numb. Actually, that too may be a good choice in today’s America.
February 17th, 2010 at 11:37 pm
Well said Wanda! Thanks!